[astrange]

> All human creativity are points ON the SAME Curve.

That's what they said about mathematical proofs.

> If you come up with an algorithm that can traverse that curve you've found the algorithm for human creativity.

And that's what they said about programs that take finite time to prove whether or not other programs halt.

Neither of those turned out to be true though. (In particular, because the curve you're talking about is infinitely large and so you cannot compute on it in finite time.)

Also, real world things cannot be reduced to their bit descriptions because they have metadata even if their descriptions are identical: https://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23

[ninetyninenine]

>And that's what they said about programs that take finite time to prove whether or not other programs halt.

An actualization of human creativity exists. Your brain.

The existence of your brain as a physical thing indicates that human creativity can be actualized. It’s literal proof via existence.

It’s the complete opposite of what you describe. We have proof that it is 100 percent possible.

[astrange]

Turing completeness arguments don't apply to brains because we have infinite storage space ;)

(it's in the environment around us and other people's brains.)

Obviously you can construct something with human level creativity, it just takes two people and nine months.