|
|
|
|
|
by arcimpulse
757 days ago
|
|
They do actually have relationships with these institutions, and are in some cases likely stuck between friendly relations with their funding source xor showing solidarity with their readers, authors, and editors. https://placesjournal.org/academic-partners/ I get that you'd rather never hear about the war again--probably doesn't affect you materially, after all--but this isn't an "awkward injection of political opinions into [an] unrelated space." They're embedded in it. The extra effort of closing a dialog box doesn't seem like too much of a cost for you to bear in exchange for reading their article. |
|
> The extra effort of closing a dialog box doesn't seem like too much of a cost for you to bear in exchange for reading their article.
It’s not about the cost of closing the dialog box, but the indication of poor quality and poor staff that this type of mentality indicates. It undermines the credibility of their work on topics like architecture, when they see fit to bring personal politics into this unrelated topic.