|
|
|
|
|
|
by nicklecompte
757 days ago
|
|
|
I don't think any of us will live to see AI smarter than a rat. So I am not concerned whether this team was going to superalign anything. The problem is that OpenAI's software, especially GPT-4o, is primed for dangerous misuse, and the demo videos of GPT-4o seemed "misaligned" with any reasonable standards of AI safety. Even if Leike/Sutskever have delusions of grandeur about AGI, at least they cared about the idea of AI safety. It seems like pushing the team out meant getting rid of a lot of internal critics (and implicitly threatening anyone else who might speak up). |
|
|
Rat, dog, human, bee. Doesn't matter. The moment AI is able to incrementally improve a bee intelligence will evolve into rat, blink again and its dog, another blink and its smarter than us.
That is the danger. The issue of control and danger is not linear but exponential. And without a plan to deal with issues things can get out of control exponentially faster.
> The problem is that OpenAI's software, especially GPT-4o, is primed for dangerous misuse, and the demo videos of GPT-4o seemed "misaligned" with any reasonable standards of AI safety.
I forgot who said it, maybe Sam Altman. The reason for releasing the current models was to show public what the current AI can do and how far it progressed. To get people to understand where we are and where we can get to with AI
Sort of like giving people muskets so they adapt to it before machine-guns appear.
It forces other AI research to also show their stuff and not keep everything secret, until one day out of the blue we have pocket nukes available at everycorner for low low price of $10