|
|
|
|
|
|
by gopher_space
760 days ago
|
|
|
> However, it is equally possible for individuals to reject these influences. The crux of your thesis is a legal point of view, not a scientific one. It's a relic from when Natural Philosophy was new and hip, and fundamentally obviated by leaded gasoline. Discussing free will in a biological context is meaningless because the concept is defined by social coercion. It's the opposite of slavery. |
|
|