|
|
|
|
|
by ben_w
756 days ago
|
|
I agree with what I think you're saying, so I'm not sure I've understood you. I think this is all still compatible with saying that ingesting an entire book is still: > If you're taking a handful of word probabilities from every book ever written, then the portion taken from each work is very, very low (Though I wouldn't want to make a bet either way on "so courts aren't likely to care" that follows on from that quote: my not-legally-trained interpretation of the rules leads to me being confused about how traditional search engines aren't a copyright violation). |
|