Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throwaway14356 762 days ago
does that mean you could also split the set in half multiple times then run it on each half of a half (etc) and combine it with its other half?

that would seem simpler to me.

edit: oh but then you would need to keep the results which defeats the purpose

1 comments

You would need to assume a uniform distribution of items, which I don’t think this does