|
|
|
|
|
by wackycat
759 days ago
|
|
| A suitably detailed feature ticket isn't much more than a prompt. The ticket would need to get down to a code level in specification of what needed to be done. This is the part I think folks underestimate when saying that "Coding as a career might be over". Gen AI can write decent code, but constructing software from code, and coming up with implementation ideas and turning those into tickets still feels far away at least from my experience using ChatGPT and CoPilot. Also those systems were trained on code but I don't know that they have the best idea of quality of the code they were trained on. |
|
In all seriousness though, an AI at this point can do some cool things with some handholding, prompt refinement, etc such that its almost a Jr. Dev. Both more or less went to school for CS and both are minimally experienced but have a lot of code to look at and draw conclusions from. Neither know anything about the business domain. Both generate candidate solutions that will at best require some additional guidance.
Personally, I don't see things getting too far beyond this in the near term. Perhaps AI becomes a very good Jr Dev who can handle "write me a function with inputs Foo,Bar that returns the [biz logic] as Baz" and the "coders" modern job is to generate maybe 50% of the necessary code where the other 50% is the integration.
Who knows ... but I dont see people saying the things I think people would say if anyone was actually doing this for realsies.