[wahern]

Wouldn't you need to add support for the tail call extensions, return_call (opcode 0x12) and return_call_indirect (opcode 0x13)? Stitch doesn't appear to implement those, even though Stitch itself relies on TCO for instruction dispatch, for which (IIUC) LLVM would emit return_call or return_call_indirect.

[ejpbruel]

That’s a good point! I did’t even think about that. For Stitch to become self hosting, we’d either have to implement those instructions, or implement a fallback mode using an interpreter loop with a trampoline. The latter would negate most of the speed benefits of Stitch though.

[koolala]

Interesting, thank you for explaining so clearly.