|
|
|
|
|
by thefisola
761 days ago
|
|
I assume you've answered your question but just to explain further: So generally in order to actually help you mass unsubscribe from unwanted emails, most email cleaning tools handle your email data on their server. The process of parsing email data to fetching unsubscribe links or unsubscribe instructions etc.. So there's a trust problem where some tools have been caught selling user data:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/24/technology/personal-data-... So the goal here with InboxPurge is to move all these processes related to your email data to your device(browser), ensuring your privacy. |
|
> ensuring your privacy
But only if we trust the extension author (and the authors of all of the transitive dependencies) to be neither malicious nor incompetent… right? I don’t know of resources that explain exactly what actions each permission in the manifest grants the extension to perform, nor a characterization of the execution environment of extensions. Do all browsers handle these matters similarly? Does some browser provide any more isolation or sandboxing than any other?
Edit: by no means did I mean to throw shade or cast doubt on your extension, I’m just grumpy in general and in particular about browser extensions, since nowadays “the browser is the OS”.
[0] or maybe there’s a gmail api that does it for you, and this extension actually can’t make arbitrary http connections?