Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bongodongobob 758 days ago
That doesn't mean we pad all the rooms or ban peanuts. Yes, we should care for them but not at the detriment of the other 99%.
1 comments

Well, conveniently, this is benefitting the 1% much more than the 99%
And a nanny state benefits a different 1% much more than the 99%.
That's a false dilemma.
Having seem far too many orgs implode because of that new 1%, no it really isn't. Replacing greed with self-righteousness as the original sin of those in power does not help anyone.
Do you mean the richest 1%? How? Sounds pretty woo woo to me.