|
|
|
|
|
by mike_d
761 days ago
|
|
> Can't imagine a change like this would be made without some analysis.. would love an internal view into a decision like this Sure, here you go: There was some buzz and negative press so it got picked up by the social media managers who forwarded it to executive escalations who loops in legal. Legal realizes that what they are doing is borderline fraud and sends it to the VP that oversees billing as a P0. It then gets handed down to a senior director who is responsible for fixing it within a week. Comms gets looped in to soft announce it. At no point does anyone look at log data or give a shit about any instrumentation. It is a business decision to limit liability to a lawsuit or BCP investigation. As a publicly traded company it is also extremely risky for them to book revenue that comes from fraudulent billing. |
|
But the only way that matters is the core one - analysis, data, and instrumentation.
AWS does not make these kinds of decisions without a look at the metrics.