Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pt_PT_guy 764 days ago
They want to do this because they want more traction for their blockchain: TRON, which, IIRC, is the payment method for ads, usernames and "stuff" inside Telegram.

However Du Rove is right about a bunch of things:

- Signal clients suck, specially the Desktop one where they ship (or used to) pre-built binaries like their own lib: https://github.com/signalapp/ringrtc - Also you can't have Signal without Google Play Store - Signal client suck in usability. I wish I had Telegram client (android) and desktop (qt) instead of this electron garbage. Telegram clients are super-duper-awesome - I would say that removing phone number requirement is their #1 request. yet they take so much time to address it, specially when they cry about phone number validation SMS costs - BTW, telegram is implementing a very nice idea of a crowd sourced sms validation, where they use their users phone numbers to send the validation sms - They have a very questionable crypto integration with MobileCoin, which have a obscure value: they depend on IntelSGX and is 95% pre-mined

2 comments

> you can't have Signal without Google Play Store

You can use Signal without the Play Store. Download the apk from Signal's website and it will use a background connection to receive calls and notifications. The downside is that it's heavier on the battery.

just that? then why not a f-droid release?
They seem to want everyone to use the official app. That's supposed to be fine because of the reproducible builds.

In any case, if we don't trust the official client/app/build, then I'm not sure if a F-Droid release would help that much. If we think there's something funny with the official apk, then we can't trust any part of Signal.

ton and tron are not the same thing
ty. you're right