Could be. There’s at least a link to the paper. Unfortunately it’s a preprint, not peer reviewed.
I can’t tell at a glance if the science is bs, but I can certainly tell that writing for a general audience before peer review is a shit thing to do and should certainly discount this article.
The OP hasn't commented in 3 months, and has submitted numerous articles from the same domain. The other mostly come from another domain with an identical UX.
I can’t tell at a glance if the science is bs, but I can certainly tell that writing for a general audience before peer review is a shit thing to do and should certainly discount this article.