|
|
|
|
|
|
by BearOso
775 days ago
|
|
|
Pascal's wager doesn't require much effort on behalf of the user, though. The idea is the benefits far outweigh the downsides. So should we just try to have a cleaner earth with the benefit of subverting this dangerous thing if it does exist? The clincher here is that most of the greenhouse gasses come from giant corporations. As non-billionaire individuals, we don't have to personally give anything up. All we have to do is get those corporations to stop polluting simply because it's more profitable in the short term. |
|
|
Agreed. Also happy to personally give up conveniences if it helps.
The distinction is between 'this bad thing should be fixed', and 'this double plus super duper bad thing is going to kill everyone'.
Why even bother if the second one correct?