[alchemist1e9]

“data-chained” will be very valuable, especially for the system to evaluate itself and verify the work it’s performed.

this is obviously just my initial impression on a distracted Sunday but I’m very encouraged by your project and I will absolutely be following it and looking at your source code.

The detractors don’t understand LLMs and probably haven’t used them in the way you have and I have. They don’t understand that with CoT and OPA that they can be used to reason and think themselves.

I’ve used them for full automated script writing, performing the job of a software developer. I’ve also used them to create study guides and practice tests, and then grade those tests. When one implements first hand automated systems with agent frameworks using the APIs it gives a deeper understanding of their power over the basic chat usage most are familiar with.

The people arguing that your system can’t do real science are silly, as if the tedious process and logical thinking is something so complex and human that the LLMs can’t do it when used within a cognitive framework, of course they can!

Anyway I’m very exited by your project. I hope this summer to spend at least a week dedicated to setting it up and exploring potential integrations with txtai for use on private knowledge bases in addition to your public Scholarly published papers.