So the incumbent "nobility" dont have to fear challenges to the status quo from the business arena. Circle back a minute fraction of such taxes to the common folks to keep consensus
You have to start somewhere. Zeitgeist will change as the electorate turns over. 1.8M US voters 55+ die every year, 4M voters turn 18. Who has been more lucky financially? Rhetorical question of course.
This is less politics and more first principles really. If we can arrive at the thesis that super wealthy people are more lucky than skilled [1] [2] [3] [4], we should build systems around the idea that there should be limits around the shared delusion of what wealth is. This is a bit like copyright, where the incentives were well intentioned, but the system and outcome has come off the rails.
Failing that, a central bank can inflate away wealth, depending on the desired outcome, circumstances, etc. Wealthy equality printer go brrrr.
This is less politics and more first principles really. If we can arrive at the thesis that super wealthy people are more lucky than skilled [1] [2] [3] [4], we should build systems around the idea that there should be limits around the shared delusion of what wealth is. This is a bit like copyright, where the incentives were well intentioned, but the system and outcome has come off the rails.
Failing that, a central bank can inflate away wealth, depending on the desired outcome, circumstances, etc. Wealthy equality printer go brrrr.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/03/all-billion...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/books/article/2024/may/04/scott-...
[3] https://ustrustaem.fs.ml.com/content/dam/ust/articles/pdf/20...
[4] https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-rol...
https://www.stlouisfed.org/institute-for-economic-equity/the... (obligatory St Louis Fed Wealth Inequality citation)