[8organicbits]

> You are solely responsible for the entire content of created manuscripts including their rigour, quality, ethics and any other aspect. The process should be overseen and directed by a human-in-the-loop and created manuscripts should be carefully vetted by a domain expert. The process is NOT error-proof and human intervention is necessary to ensure accuracy and the quality of the results.

I'm happy to see this directly stated. Is there any guidance for domain experts on the types of mistakes an LLM will make? The process will be different from vetting a university student's paper so they are unlikely to know what to look out for. How often will a domain expert reject generated papers? Given the large vetting burden, does this save any time versus doing the research the traditional way? I'm honestly wary domain experts won't be used, careful review won't be performed, and believable AI slop will spread in academic channels that aren't ready to weed out these flawed papers. We're relying pretty heavily on personal ethics here, right?