[kortilla]

Your “clarification” was to post a famously ambiguous sentence. It’s trivial to parse that as the militia being regulated, not the “bearing arms” part. Especially since it’s explicitly stating that the right “shall not be infringed”.

[pintxo]

Funny that you start with agreeing that the meaning is ambiguous, and then follow up with it being trivial to parse. So what is it? Ambiguous or trivial to parse? I don’t think you can have it both ways.

[r2_pilot]

And further, since it is ambiguous, would it be so difficult for us to come together as a nation and, well, reduce the ambiguity? It's not like the Constitution is a suicide pact, we are allowed to make changes.

[brokenmachine]

It's quite literally an amendment.

[pintxo]

We can have changes of changes, can't we?

[brokenmachine]

Doesn't seem like it.

[kortilla]

It’s trivial to parse it either way without mental gymnastics.