Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
thbb123
766 days ago
The analysis is interesting, but why the alternative of using bricks instead of stone or concrete is not studied at all?
Seems even more efficient to mould clay than to carve stones, even it becomes fully automated.
4 comments
citrin_ru
765 days ago
Firing bricks requires a lot of energy, cutting stone probably requires less energy but would be good to see the numbers.
link
31carmichael
757 days ago
Bricks are not structural replacements for either concrete or stone.
link
kylehotchkiss
765 days ago
Brick construction during an earthquake is an absolute nightmare. Steel tensioned stone sounds like it could potentially work around that?
link
RicoElectrico
765 days ago
The whole concept is based on local availability of stone, so probably that's the reason. Is clay similarly abundant?
link