[whoopdedo]

The feature flag is put there by upstream. If they don't want to support non-network installs then why do they even have that lever?

That said it probably makes more sense for Debian to package a `keepassxc-nonet` alongside the default `keepassxc` so end users can choose the variant.

[Kwpolska]

If a user wants to build a hardened copy, they are free to do that. Distros should provide a version with standard features that are expected by end users.

[kiwijamo]

As a Debian user I like how Debian just includes the basics in the main package and provides optional extras if you want them. I'm not sure how other distros handle it the other way around -- if the main package includes everything the risk is naive users install packages that include functions they don't need that end up exposing security issues. The Debian approach provides a reduced attack surface out of the box and if I happen to need something more its easy to just apt search ${package_name} and see what other extensions are available and install these. I do this regularly for PHP modules for instance if some PHP code complains a certain module is not available. It may not be your cup of tea but this is the Debian approach, and it makes sense from the perspective of a defensive user like me to keep things simple.

[netsharc]

I agree, it's also supremely obnoxious that upgrading a piece of software means losing a lot of functionality - unless the user knows s/he needs to replace the package with the -full version..

Wahey, isn't that what MS does with e.g. Outlook. Congrats Debian, you're reaching Microsoft's level!

[kiwijamo]

I agree that is unfortunate however I would argue the package should have been built that way in the first place. It's not the best thing to do now but better late than never. I wonder if the Debian maintainer would consider some sort of transactional package which brings in the new package if you had the original one installed. However, as someone who has used Keepass and did not realise it had all these extra functionalities, I think the assessment that most users will see no difference is ultimately closer to the truth than many people realise. I migrated away from Keepass specifically because I thought it had no network functions which makes all this drama especially ironic for a software that was marketed (at the time) as a password manager to keep on your own device and not someone else's machine.

[int_19h]

This kind of thing is one of the reasons why we have different distros. For Debian, it's actually common to provide a "minimal" package plus one or more versions built with different feature flags.