Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by acemarke 764 days ago
Can you clarify some terms here?

- What do you mean by "React as a library"? Using it as a pure SPA with a bundler like Vite? Using it as a plain `<script>` tag?

- What do you mean by "go back to MVC"? What does "MVC" mean specifically in this case?
1 comments
blacksoil 764 days ago
- Using it as a plain `<script>` tag?

Yes.

- What do you mean by "go back to MVC"? What does "MVC" mean specifically in this case?

MVC as in Model-View-Controller.

To give more context, I'm prototyping a lot, and having to create endpoints for every single APIs is quite a chore. Also I want to avoid the overhead of having to run separate server just to host the frontend (e.g. NextJS)

link
acemarke 763 days ago
I know what "MVC" _stands_ for, but I'm asking what _context_ you mean that in. Are you talking about how to define your server-side data models and endpoints? How you're organizing client-side fetching and caching?

Normally "MVC" as a concept doesn't get used in the React ecosystem (the way it did with Backbone.js).

FWIW it's certainly _possible_ to use React as a script tag, but it's extremely rare. It's normally expected that the frontend _is_ actually bundled and compiled, whether it be using a pure-SPA build tool like Vite, or one of the full server-side frameworks like Next or Remix.

Note that the SPA build output is just a set of static HTML/JS/CSS files, which do not require a separate Node server process for hosting - they can be served by any HTTP server.

My own advice would be to use Vite and build as an SPA.

_If_ you absolutely want to use React as _just_ a `<script>` tag with no build step, I'd recommend also using https://github.com/developit/htm to at least give you JSX-like syntax for writing your components.

link