[eddywebs]

Link to deck Please?

[lelandfe]

Risky due to steganography; the leaker might be compromised.

[jedberg]

Run it through Claude and ask Claude to summarize :)

[Jerrrry]

Blur, summarize, anonymize, convert to bitmap/PNG, release.

edit: i am aware it is literally impossible to release information without the remote chance of whistle-sniping.

the then only logical conclusion reached from such a defeatist extreme attitude threat model is to then assume that all stories and information are false flags distributed to find moles.

the decks themselves are surely water-marked in ways cleverer than even the smartest here. that doesn't innately negate the benefit of having some iota of the raw data versus the risk of the mole being wacked.

I didn't mean to infantilize the most powerful companies abilities; after all, they encoded the serial number of internal xbox's devkits into the 360 dashboard's passive background animation, which wasn't discovered until a decade later.

But the responses' tilt here are a lil....glowing.

[nwsm]

Literally anything in the document could out them. Color, font, word choice, numbers, etc. OpenAI fired two researchers this year for leaking information, likely watermarked resources. OpenAI takes this seriously

[barbariangrunge]

Sounds like the actions of a truly open ai company

[JumpCrisscross]

> Blur, summarize, anonymize, convert to bitmap/PNG

The article is a summary. Everything else is defeated by moving subtle decorative elements around the page between copies.

[fwip]

Going further: Even summaries can be dangerous, as the inclusion/exclusion of facts can itself be part of a watermark.