|
|
|
|
|
by mewpmewp2
768 days ago
|
|
I find your reasoning quite odd. It either must be 0 effect or actively harmful to not justify a $10/cost. How much do you value an hour of your time? Because even 1 percent productivity gain would be worth more than $10 a month for me. |
|
To be blunt, it's perfectly reasonable. They didn't even get that proclaimed "one percent!"
How does one even meaningfully measure this? No matter.
In their case, instead of saving time or effort, it was adding. It was a removable cost.
If one really wants to dwell, there's game theory. Could it be made to be effective? Probably. Is it worth it? Don't know.
They told us 'no', we should listen for their situation.
At risk of splitting hairs, I need more than one percent. This isn't a vacuum, I'm not a spherical cow, etc.
Point being: wanting both my money and attention has a high bar of admission. Learning a thing has a cost, becoming dependent, and so on.
I'm well into rambling now, feel free to tune out. I'm not sacrificing autonomy for a pittance. I was fine before I knew about $OFFERING. Truth in advertising is idealistic, at best.