Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by darby_eight 769 days ago
Why would they not simply use lidar in the cars themselves?

Besides, I imagine many of the issues with vision (e.g. adverse weather) could not be addressed with training-time data.

2 comments

> Besides, I imagine many of the issues with vision (e.g. adverse weather)

LIDAR is bad in rain, fog and snow.

So are cameras.
And people
Because $1000 of Lidar hardware per car would be $1.85 billion per year.
If you make millions of them per year, lidar won't cost $1k per car. OTOH existing lidar designs are not designed for mass market manufacturing or serviceability.
Take out of his 56B comp package
Those are stock grants which don’t directly affect the company’s net income.
They do affect net income when they vest. It is treated as an expense in GAAP.