|
|
|
|
|
|
by lostlogin
777 days ago
|
|
|
> The only way I can see that being even remotely true is if the teacher's goal is mainly to push up against someone's line, politically. Doesn’t this swing both ways? Surely banning books is seen as a fairly extreme and intended to impose your views on someone else. What other interpretation is there? |
|
|
No. I was only responding to the false hyperbole that teachers can't keep books in their classrooms anymore.
Also, the whole controversy around "banning books" is stupid and full of dumb propaganda. That extends to the term "book ban" itself, which is a bit of manipulative, misleading spin that rivals "death tax." If anyone was really against "book bans," they should demonstrate their commitment by fighting for a Hustler subscription and some "gender critical" books for every classroom. It's really a fight about who gets to do the banning.