Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by FireBeyond 780 days ago
Partially funded by the government.

And consistently rated as a neutral and reliable media source.

The two concepts, though they may have some overlap, are not one and the same.

1 comments

It is definitely not consistently rated (by who?) as neutral or reliable.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/al-jazeera/ - Rated "mixed" on "factual" reporting, i.e. some facts, some lies... i.e. rates as propaganda.

EDIT: "and Mixed for factual reporting due to failed fact checks that were not corrected and misleading extreme editorial bias that favors Qatar."

EDIT2: https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/al-jazeera-%E2%80%98defe...

"by who"? I included the sources in my comment.

Even your link here says:

> In review, Al Jazeera reports news with minimally loaded wording in their headlines and articles ... properly sourced from credible news agencies. When reporting USA news, there is minimal bias in reporting ... In general, straight news reporting has a minimal bias; however, as a state-funded news agency, Al Jazeera is typically not critical of Qatar.

The failed fact checks were regarding two articles that weren't corrected.

> In 2017, Al Jazeera aired an investigative report of Britain’s Israel lobby. Following the airing, Ofcom (the UK government-approved regulatory and competition authority) received complaints from many pro-Israeli British activists, including one former Israeli embassy employee. They were accused of anti-Semitism, bias, unfair editing, and infringement of privacy, which was later cleared by Ofcom, who said the piece was not anti-semitic and was, in fact, investigative journalism.

Huh.

> Further, Saudi Arabia and three other Arab nations demanded Qatar to shut down Al-Jazeera. Al Jazeera rebuts the accusations here.

So pro-Arab that SA (and UAE, Bahrain, and Egypt) demanded Qatar shut them down...

I never said Al Jazeera is perfect, and as noted, there is a reluctance to criticize the Qatari government.

I take less issue with "some of their opinion pieces are vocally anti-Israel", unless the contention is that nothing Israel can do can be criticized for ... reasons?

> some of their opinion pieces are vocally anti-Israel

All, not some. I've been reading them regularly for a few months and have never seen anything that isn't Anti Zionist, let alone pro Israel, and this was way before the current war - I'm sure its much worse now.