|
|
|
|
|
|
by lelanthran
772 days ago
|
|
|
>> Im also interested in what the differing factor is. > vast has a lot of bad machines with terrible PCIe lanes and architecture you have to learn the hard way. Wouldn't gpudeploy have exactly the same problem? How is it mitigated with gpudeploy? |
|
|
I suspect it would be trivial for Vast or GPUDeploy to spin up a benchmarking job before allowing sales on that machine. I'm not an expert on PCIe lanes, but I would think the performance issues would be visible via bandwidth or latency on the lanes.
It kind of makes sense to me, though. If I were looking for absolute reliability and was willing to pay for it, I'd just go to one of the many GPU cloud vendors. Likewise, I suspect anyone willing to really work on getting good performance would rather be a real provider or sub-provider than being part of this nebulous C2C GPU cloud.