|
|
|
|
|
|
by vineyardmike
768 days ago
|
|
|
1. Yes the article says that insurance agencies can only look at historic risk, not future risk. So a region becoming more fire prone won’t be reflected. 2. Presumably an area that just experienced a fire is now at lower risk of a repeated burn? |
|
|
The article actually doesn't say that, that's a quote from a different article that I linked to above. The article only mentions the increased risk of wildfires and doesn't place any blame on California's regulatory environment at all.
My other comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40260160