[xingped]

So far I've somehow only run across one LLM support chatbot. And it was actually mostly helpful. Not 100% but decent enough. Better than the old support chatbots that just go "does this FAQ entry solve your problem?" Which it never ever does.

[tuetuopay]

In my experience LLM chatbots are a net improvement because they understand "put me in relation with a human" as opposed to the scripted ones that only spit out the FAQ.

[nottorp]

What? Where are those? I thought support forms, LLM based or not, are designed to never put you in touch with a human.

[tuetuopay]

I guess that an LLM is harder to scope and retain, and does what it is instructed to. While traditional chatbots can only do what they are programmed for (e.g. follow a scenario), LLMs are easier to sidetrack. Thus you as a client may have an easier time escaping their context, especially when it's a generic LLM integration done by underpaid contractors.

It really depends, but at least here in france many companies start having support over whatsapp/messenger/the likes. They used to suck hard a few years ago, but my recent experience with sncf connect (french railway company) was surprisingly good given my issue was working around an idiosyncracy of their system.

YMMV as we are talking about chatbots and not plain old forms, thus the interactivity is better and feedback loop to escape the LLM's context is faster.

[nottorp]

But you can't escape the LLM context if there's nowhere to escape to :)

I.e. when the LLM is your only support option.