|
|
|
|
|
|
by kadoban
782 days ago
|
|
|
Oh, woops. I thought the list went way higher, my bad. I did read that I think if you do up to 2*ln(n)^2 you're always good, but that's not _that_ short of a list. Probably better off just keeping it probabalistic, negating my original post :( |
|
|