[ben_w]

Do any of those alternative responses to my already-answered rhetorical questions change the fact that the fruits held by rich owners ended up on the tables of the poor?

I have literally no idea what you're doing with that metaphor in the last paragraph.

[peteradio]

What I'm saying is that if you don't have good reason to think some vastly wealthy thing isn't building a giant cock sucking device then you should assume it is in fact building supreme cock sucker and not you or anyone will get in the way.

[ben_w]

And?

What does this metaphor have to do with "will the rich let poor people have medical treatment"?

Given that the rich are, as I have demonstrated via the example of Gates, donating money to make sure the poor have medical treatment, along with all the other examples I gave of the rich being forced to help the poor even when they don't do so voluntarily.

[peteradio]

Weak examples which are utterly penetrated by the inevitable phallus.

[ben_w]

Sufficient examples.

You asked "Why would the owners of this technology ever share it with you?"

Because of all the reasons they already do.

[peteradio]

Bilk Gates infected you with windows, perhaps some sort of parasitic control is causing you to believe it was mutually beneficial.