|
|
|
|
|
|
by autoexec
774 days ago
|
|
|
> I don't disagree with Myth #3, You could. It says "First, science never proves anything; instead it produces explanations of observations." but science doesn't have to explain an observation. There are tons of times when science tells us what we'll observe under certain conditions while never giving us an explanation for how/why it works out that way. An explanation is the ideal, but all science needs is to give us something we can reasonably predict to be useful. |
|
|