[drdaeman]

It’s not about not being able to stand being beaten and not being the best. I’m truly sorry that a lot of people who cheat are also toxic.

I’m not advocating for unfairness by just letting people use automation to trample upon those who don’t. Like I’ve said, a machine will always win an unaided human in some tasks - so there is no competition here. Rather, I propose to accept automation and start giving it to everyone, so games will be fair for everyone. If some mechanic relies on imperfect mechanical skills - that’s a bad mechanics that never will be fair despite any wishes to make it so.

Technology is the greatest equalizer. Don’t automatically blindly hate people who want to make bots or copilots. That was the whole point.

[NoPicklez]

Firstly, the decision needs to be made whether we allow people to use automation and these games have already said no, which is the agreed upon consensus for players. We don't want to allow cheats or people to automate their gameplay.

We want the developers to provide the constraints so that there is a fair playground, they do this via the game mechanics and preventing outside automation. We just want to play games using the mechanics provided to us, we don't want to focus on building automation to outsmart the competition, we want to outsmart the competition by being a better player when everything is considered equal.

I am automatically against people who make bots or copilots in games that explicitly say you can't use them, in games where the players don't want them and don't want to up against them. That is the whole point.

These anti-cheat solutions are combatting people making or using copilots in games where people don't want them and where the rules say you can't use them. That is the whole point.