This is an interesting topic, I want to know the reason too, but the article seems not delivering the reason, only provided a few empirical experiments and concluded.
Sorry about that. I have a mental illness which can sometimes make clear exposition difficult for me.
I think the point I am trying to make is that the referenced AI-written articles are basically fluff pieces that don’t solve any real world problems. In general, those operating at the frontier of new knowledge can’t make use of AI because AI is incapable of producing anytime “new”.
I think the point I am trying to make is that the referenced AI-written articles are basically fluff pieces that don’t solve any real world problems. In general, those operating at the frontier of new knowledge can’t make use of AI because AI is incapable of producing anytime “new”.
Does that make sense?