Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hitpointdrew 778 days ago
Serious question, why not just use kubernetes instead of Nomad?

The only “kinda cool”, thing I saw with Nomad is that it can “orchestrate” binary files, not just containers.

That said, putting binaries in containers isn’t very difficult.

3 comments

I like the single-binary approach that Nomad (and Consul) uses. Whereas, Kubernetes feels like a complicated web of services and APIs that need to work together. There's also a bunch of choices that need to be made up front when deploying Kubernetes to decide which distribution to use and which components you may or may not need. Kubernetes is a lot more flexible and powerful than Nomad, but Nomad is a lot easier to deploy and manage.
Same reason why you use Ruby instead of Java, Nomad has its own opinionated way of doing things that jives with a lot of people.
Why use a knife when you can use our EveryThingCutter-9000 that requires a week of training to operate.