[cbsmith]

> Both were whistleblowers of which there are allegedly no more than 32 in the last few years.

Yeah, out of a population of 32, it's unlikely to happen. It seems likely that this number is grossly underrepresenting the size of the population. Maybe whistleblowers are being targeted, maybe there are a lot more than 32, maybe both of those are true, but it seems unlikely that both of them are false.

[jjk166]

There were 2 deaths from the population of known whistleblowers. If there are additional unknown whistleblowers, they still don't count as members of the population. There's no way to count deaths among unknown whistleblowers.

[cbsmith]

"I'm baffled by this comment. It's exceedingly rare for two middle-aged and otherwise healthy people to die without warning."

That statement is not even limited to whistleblowers.

If you restrict the population to known Boeing whistleblowers whose first name starts with J, the odds get even longer.

[jjk166]

And if someone had predicted ahead of time that the second dead boeing whistleblower would have a first name starting with J that would have been quite astounding. But since we are waiting until after the two whistleblowers are dead and then choosing something we already know they have in common, no it is not any less probable.