|
|
|
|
|
|
by fastasucan
777 days ago
|
|
|
>hypothesis that is inconsistent with experiment must be rejected Not really, this is a conclusion that is drawn only by looking at the big names and highlights throughout the scientific history. In practice the experiments in themselves is flawed, so if the hypothesis is not confirmed through experiments the experiment design need to be fixed. Other times they are confirmed where the experiments also was flawed. Also there are a lot of hypothesis we cannot reject, but we still build scientific work upon them. |
|
|
Yes, of course. Experimental error is always a possibilities, but that is just another hypothesis that needs to be considered along with all the other possibilities.
> Also there are a lot of hypothesis we cannot reject, but we still build scientific work upon them.
Like what?