|
|
|
|
|
|
by _akhe
772 days ago
|
|
|
An attorney with takes like "they don't put the facts from cases into SQL databases to query" yikes! They literally do > you've clearly never used the software I use > this tool doesn't know my workflow > etc. LLMs already train on knowledgebases like WestLaw. You really think there will never exist an LLM for legal research, etc.? That much is probably happening now, I just haven't heard of the startup. > Get a f*king grip So a defendants PII, plea, criminal history, time served, etc. are not important to a defense attorney? |
|
|
Oh, so now its back to facts and not just documents? I said they don't abstract the facts into an SQL database. Westlaw is not an SQL database of facts. It does not have a series of different entries of different types of facts about a case. When you search for something on Westlaw, it's not filtering through different kinds of facts to see if there is a pertinent entry, it's just string searching. I pointed this out to you earlier.
>LLMs already train on knowledgebases like WestLaw. You really think there will never exist an LLM for legal research, etc.? That much is probably happening now, I just haven't heard of the startup.
I never said that.
>So a defendants PII, plea, criminal history, time served, etc. are not important to a defense attorney?
No, not to the extent that it would ever justify what you claimed about the utility a RAG would provide.