[rembicilious]

I found the comment to be informative and the condescension thought provoking. I guess it’s because the disparagement cuts both ways. There is criticism for the marketer who uses these techniques as a cheap ploy and for the consumer who lets the Trojan horse enter because “ooh a horsey”. Obviously the post could have been more pragmatic, but then bland? Not everyone enjoys onion even though the flavour is remarkable. But in a way the “denigration” is like the pretty demo effects. It dresses the whole comment up in something that pops out and here we are having been derailed from the op subject

[edanm]

Calling people "the chimp troupe" with "3 inch brains" is not a good way to communicate your ideas. For sure not to the people you're calling chimps, but also not to anyone else except people who both agree with you and have similar contempt for others as you do.

[lukan]

You can also read it as ironicaly self mocking, as the commentor him or herself is also included in the chimp group.

[omeze]

I thought it was so over the top it transcended condescension and was firmly comedic. Gilfoyle from HBO’s Silicon Valley could’ve written that.

[ziffusion]

I'd like to follow you. Do you capture your ramblings somewhere?

[rembicilious]

Wow no stranger has ever said that to me before and I really liked it, thank you! /desperate acknowledgment I don’t write, no social media either. Just staying in my place, a lurky digital hermit since the 90’s

[throwaway14356]

Ah yes, the days when it doesn't even suck was high praise. When men were made of cardboard rather than rice paper.

[Gabriel_Martin]

I came back specifically for the comment to find it flagged.