[dphuang2]

The original purpose of the article is to highlight opinions from the community—not to be a scientific conclusion on what approach is better.

If somebody is seeking an answer for their own engineering problems, then the necessary due diligence is always required on their part.

[evantbyrne]

Please do not take this criticism personally, but it also fails as a survey. Two issues that immediately stand out are that responses were filtered out entirely for not being the most popular and then the remainder were cherry picked based on unclear criteria. You seem to have an interest in surveys and many of the skills needed to conduct them, so it would benefit you to study the topic more scientifically. Wish you the best.

[dphuang2]

none taken—I appreciate the criticism!