|
|
|
|
|
|
by yjftsjthsd-h
780 days ago
|
|
|
> I think that portability is a deliberate anti-goal of systemd. Yes, and that is one of the things I dislike about it. (In fairness, the list of things I like about it and the list of things I dislike about it are both fairly long.) > No, you must run something on pid 1 that implements the spec, similar to how musl can be used instead of glibc - they both implement the same spec. > Run0 expects pid 1 to behave a certain way, much like my web browser expects web servers to behave a certain way. If there's only one implementation, then it's not portable. If a webapp uses a web API that only Chrome implements, it's not portable regardless of whether Google published a spec for their non-standard behavior. There are dozens of web servers and web clients that all speak HTTP, there is one systemd. |
|
|