|
|
|
|
|
by Maxatar
778 days ago
|
|
The issue is that everyone has their own hopes and dreams for what modules in C++ should and could be, and what ended up being standardized is an unbelievably complicated and overengineered mess. A small number of people worked on standardizing modules, and the proposal is so complicated and obscure I really doubt if most of the people who voted to approve it actually understood what it is they were even voting on. In the future, things should not get standardized without an actual working implementation of the feature that people can actually use. Even better would be to have multiple similar non-standard features that each compiler can implement, and then the standardization can serve as way for them to converge. |
|