[vidarh]

I'm from Norway. In Sweden it's so important it's part of their constitution. In Norway it's so important it was one of (the?) last parts of Norwegian law to be codified - it was considered so self evident courts took it into account despite Norway not using a common law system.

Very different approaches, but both coming from the feeling you quickly get that you can not be truly free if you're surrounded by fenced off land once you're used to it.

The other effect is that there is - ironically in a country with extremely high government ownership of other things - less pressure in the government to own land.

We don't need national parks (we still have some) to make land accessible to the public, because it all is.