Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kimixa 785 days ago
I know it (the A100) at least has the texture pipeline too, so it's certainly got more "Graphics" optimized parts than this.

Really nomenclature is a mess, everyone hops on the next big term until you're not sure what it means anymore.

1 comments

GPU as a term lost meaning when it changed to Generative Processing Unit from General Processing Unit some time in the last couple years.

And no, GPGPU is a bloody stupid term.

I thought GPU stood for Graphics Processing Unit. Is this not the case?
It used to. Some time in the mid 2010s it changed to General Processing Unit, driven by things like PhysX, crowdsourced protein crunching efforts like Folding@Home, and particularly the cryptocurrency mining boom.

Now we're in the 2020s and GPUs are all about being Generative Processing Units thanks to the "AI" craze.

I don't think that is the prevailing sentiment. GPU still means Graphics Processing Unit to me and most tech people I know. I think it's more just in the folding and crypto communities that people have repurposed the initialism.
But I have still used GPUs as graphics processing units for game and little else this entire time as has everyone I know. Who decided on this nonclemature change? Because it certainly doesnt represent the primary use case...
> Who decided on this nonclemature change?

No one; it's just something Dalewyn is making up.

First time I hear this. Given how you are being down voted, I'm probably not the only one.
Downvotes mean little, arguably even moreso than Reddit. I've noticed I've garnered a dedicated downvote squad who tend to make the rounds once or twice a day.

But that aside: Surely you've heard of GPGPU (General Purpose Graphics Processing Unit), a term I again call bloody stupid. Just call it a General Processing Unit in that case. More recently, the amount of money changing hands in furious bids for more Generative Processing Units to fuel the "AI" craze absolutely dwarves actual graphical applications and even the general use cases.

I'm merely calling the bird that quacks like a duck a duck, not a swan duck bird.

This was a correct use of downvotes. You posted something as truth that you seemingly just made up.
Feel free to link to one academic paper or news article that uses this term. Google couldn't find one, perhaps you can.