Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fiddlerwoaroof 787 days ago
And this is just not true: I’ve worked on large lisp programs in various situations with minimal documentation and done just fine.
1 comments

That's not a strong argument.

That's like saying world hunger does not exist because you had lasagna for dinner.

How about the existence of major pieces of software written in Common Lisp? For example, American Express fraud detection was and maybe still is done by a CL program. Google Flights uses ITA Software’s CL flight search system. Emacs is widely used and contains a lot of lisp.

I think basically no languages have failed or succeeded for technical reasons: generally, marketing and inertia explains the tech stack better than DX or theoretical superiority.