|
|
|
|
|
by mezentius
773 days ago
|
|
I'm not hand-waving the issue; as I said, it's clearly a very difficult problem. But it is not an ethical dilemma; it is a resource-allocation problem. In the United States, we are historically good at solving those, when properly motivated. Why can't more machines be made? Why are there a limited number of people who can maintain them and perform care on a long-term basis? These are questions that lie downstream of many long-standing institutional problems with the practice of medicine in the US, and framing them as ethical "maybe-some-people-should-just-die" questions is missing the broader story. |
|
Sure, it's a resource-allocation problem, but _right now_ it is an ethical dilemma. None of what you're suggesting will suddenly make the problem gone in a year, hence why I called it hand-waving.
> Why are there a limited number of people who can maintain them and perform care on a long-term basis?
You're just asking the question "why aren't there more people working in the ICU?". Somehow I don't think this is a problem that would be solved in a year if someone just 'finally sat down and worked on it'.
As the the article points out, people are _already_ working on the issues you came up with, it just turns out they're actually hard problems to solve.