|
|
|
|
|
by Workaccount2
777 days ago
|
|
Usually when I encounter sentiment like this it is because they only have used 3.5 (evidently not the case here) or that their prompting is terrible/misguided. When I show a lot of people GPT4 or Claude, some percentage of them jump right to "What year did Nixon get elected?" or "How tall is Barack Obama?" and then kind of shrug with a "Yeah, Siri could do that ten years ago" take. Beyond that you have people who prompt things like "Make a stock market program that has tabs for stocks, and shows prices" or "How do you make web cookies". Prompts that even a human would struggle greatly with. For the record, I use GPT4 and Claude, and both have dramatically boosted my output at work. They are powerful tools, you just have to get used to massaging good output from them. |
|
This is the "You're not using it right" defense.
It's an LLM, it's supposed to understand human language queries. I shouldn't have to speak LLM to speak to an LLM.