|
|
|
|
|
by cess11
773 days ago
|
|
I did not. I pointed out that you assumed a similarity between human judgement in courts to technical documentation and medical diagnostics, and asked on what grounds you make this assumption. It can't be that engineering and biology are so similar to jurisprudence, because they aren't. There has to be another reason for you to lump them together. |
|
Again the human judgment is not replaced in either scenario, I'm talking about a tool the lawyer, the doctor, etc. would use.
Lawyer and doctor are often listed as comparable examples because both involve sensitive info you can't afford to get wrong, unlike creative use cases for AI like image or song generation.