[jauntywundrkind]

Does anyone have a single example of a well reasoned good Reason.com article? This seems to be a no worse than average example from them. There's some ridiculous slant serving some glaringly biased agenda, with terrible argumentation.

Sources like Reason getting submitted & discussed as though their normal submissions is usually an incredibly silly time. I don't think the site should do it, but on Bluesky there's moderation layers, and it seriously makes me want something like that for the web at large, where we can turn on some kind of content warning as we browse. Content warning: specious/suspect sight. Content warning: strong agenda.

It's a bad time that the noosphere keeps happening with so little memory. That there's not cues and contexts to be like, hey, this is Reason or Quilette: don't expect normal content here.

[jazzdev]

What biased agenda do you see in this article?