|
|
|
|
|
|
by rdtsc
774 days ago
|
|
|
I really wanted to disagree with you but sadly that's how it was treated in secure environments a few years ago: "ipv6.disable=1". Everything that's not in needed would be disabled. Nobody wanted to be the first to "need it" and learn all that stuff, if it works with ipv4, stick with it. Sure, one can figure out the split DNS, tunneling/no tunneling, DHCPv6, multiple addresses per interface, additional filtering rules, or just you know "ipv6.disable=1" and worry about in a few more years perhaps. |
|
|